For now, all we can think is that it’s just yet another clone to fit the missing gap. In regards to the hull, I couldn’t find any information if this was a real proposal or just a made-up version to fit the purpose. failing to take into account the key role this valley had played during the Soviet. It still has small differences, but certainly is more accurate and to be fair, it should be what Wargaming should’ve used since the start. Title: Shoot, dont shoot : minimising risk of catastrophic error. On the other hand, a small but more positive note is, the EMIL 1951 turret seems to be modelled to the real specification of EMIL 1951 project. Aside from this, there isn’t much difference from the regular Emil I and the main question will be: how much power creep will be compared to it. Many cliches and expressions - and words - have fascinating and surprising origins, and many popular assumptions about meanings and derivations are mistaken. The hull has less armour offering less protection, but with its new 400 HP engine, you will be able to relocate easier using it’s increased 15.15 hp/t specific power. It has one less round in the loading mechanism, but the aiming parameters are better and it’s also faster shooting. In terms of gameplay, it will look like a lighter version of the regular Tier VIII EMIL I, with less armour but more mobile. Today a new Swedish tank enters Supertest, EMIL 1951, a Tier VIII Premium heavy tank with an autoloader! What many players have been asking for, to better fit the current Tech Tree that always has been missing a high Tier Premium heavy tank.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |